Membumikan Ilmu Komunikasi di Indonesia (Pembacaan Hermeneutik Gadamerian atas Tulisan-Tulisan M. Alwi Dahlan)

Winartono Winartono, Antoni Antoni, Anang Sujoko

Abstract


The emergence of Communication Science in Indonesia was related to the history of this science in Europe and America. The term “communication science” (America’s tradition) was noted to have replaced “Publisistic” (German’s tradition). M. Alwi Dahlan is an important figure behind that. Communication Science then has been developing, but still dominated by applied studies. Whereas to be a discipline, the study of history and philosophy of science shouldn’t be ignored. Furthermore, the development of a science indicates the contribution of it’s intellctuals. Here is the importance of studying Dahlan’s thoughts on communication. The researcher applied a Gadamerian perspective hermeneutic to interpret Dahlan’s writings between 1980-1990s. Based on metanarrative awareness and the spirit of non-Western perspective studies, the researcher has explored them through hermeneutic circle until getting creative meanings (Bildung). The conclusion is that Dahlan’s contribution is contextualizing or bringing Communication Science ‘down to earth’ in Indonesia especially related to development, environment, information-technology, through an eclectic perspective and by which human being as a key resource. Dahlan’s ideas has significance in the development of history and philosophy of Communication Science. Finally, this research suggest further exploration both on Dahlan and related topics.

 

Key Words: M. Alwi Dahlan, Hermeneutics, Gadamerian Perspective, Ilmu Komunikasi


Full Text:

PDF

References


Antoni. 2004. Riuhnya Persimpangan itu: Profil dan pemikiran para penggagas kajian ilmu komunikasi. Tiga Serangkai. Solo.

Bradley, J. 1993. Methodological Issues and Practices in Qualitative Research. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, Vol. 63, No. 4, Symposium on Qualitative Research: Theory, Methods, and Applications. The University of Chicago Press, 431-449.

Budi, S. 2012. Communication Review; Catatan tentang Pendidikan Komunikasi di Indonesia, Jerman dan Australia. Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Atma Jaya, ASPIKOM dan Buku Litera. Yogyakarta

Buxton, W. J. 2012. The Rise of McLuhanism, The Loss of Innis-sense: Rethinking the Origins of the Toronto School of Communication. Canadian Journal of Communication Concordia University. Complete page 577.

Creswell, J. W. 2014. Penelitian kualitatif dan desain riset: memilih di antara 5 pendekatan (edsi ke 3). Pustaka Pelajar.

Dahlan, M. A. 1982. Communication Research for policy-makers and planners: some preliminary observation. AMIC.

------. 1983. Communication and change in Indonesia: an overview. AMIC.

------. 1984. In search of the social meaning of communication satellites. AMIC.

Dahlan, M. A., Chu, G. C., & Jamieson, N. L. 1985. Report on a pilot study in environmental communication. AMIC.

Dahlan, M. A. 1986. The Palapa project and rural development in Indonesia. AMIC.

------. 1986. Environmental communication: communicating the dilemma of development. AMIC.

------. 1987. The Indonesian experience in social marketing. AMIC.

------. 1989. The environmental orientation: an alternative approach in mass media coverage. AMIC.

------. 1994. Expanding the role of media in environmental protection. AMIC.

------. 1995. Information, technology, and society. AMIC.

------. 1995. Bridging the socio-economic gap through new information technology. AMIC.

------. 1997. Pemerataan informasi, komunikasi dan pembangunan. FISIP UI.

------. 1997. Transformasi sosial abad XXI: Tantangan teknologi, komunikasi dan informasi. BP-7.

------. 1999. Information technology: enhancing or limiting democracy in Asia? AMIC.

------. 1999. Reformasi and the changing mediascape: implications of media liberalization. AMIC.

Ghasemi, A., Taghinejad, M., Kabiri, A., & Imani, M. 2011. Ricoeur’s Theory of Interpretation: A Method for Understanding Text (Course Text). World Applied Sciences Journal. 1623-1629.

Hardiman, F. B. 2015. Seni Memahami; Hermeneutik dari Schleiermacher sampai Derrida. Penerbit PT. Kanisius. Yogyakarta

Haryatmoko. 2016. Membongkar Rezim Kepastian; Pemikiran Kritis Post-Strukturalis. PT. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.

Hunter, A. 1980. Why Chicago? The Rise of the Chicago School of Urban Social Science. The American Behavioral Scientist. ABI/INFORM Collection, 215.

Katz, E. 1987. Communications Research Since Lazarsfeld. Penn libraries University of Pennsylvania.

Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. 2002. Qualitative Communication Research Methods (scond edition). SAGE Publication Inc.

McAnany, E. G. 2014. Wilbur Schramm: Beginnings of the "Communication" Field. Communication Research Trends. Volume 33.

Mulyana, D. 2013. Peluang mengembangkan kajian komunikasi. In U. Saefullah, Kapita selekta komunikasi, pendekatan budaya dan agama. p. iv. Simbiosa Rekatama Media. Bandung

Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd edition). Sage Publication, Inc. California.

Ross, M. 2013. An Alternative Path: The Intellectual Legacy of James W. Carey. Master's thesis. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/1504.

Sloan, A., & Bowe, B. 2013. Phenomenology and Hermeneutic Phenomenology: the Philosophy, the Methodologies, and Using Hermeneutic Phenomenology to Investigate Lecture's Experiences of Curriculum Design. Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht. 1291-1303.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32528/mdk.v2i2.1922

Copyright (c) 2019 MEDIAKOM



p ISSN: 2580-1899

e ISSN: 2656-5706